NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
From: Alan S
Date: 2010 Dec 5, 15:22 -0800
Some here have suggested averaging the times and Hs of a series of sextant shots, as a way of improving accuracy of results. Sounds reasonable, though this opinion seems less than universally shared, so I tried, as follows.
Re the times, I separated hours, minutes and seconds, a series of 5 shots was available, adding the seconds, and dividing by 5. Next, adding the minutes, again dividing by 5. Next adding the hours, dividing by 5. Minutes and hours were adjusted as required.
Respecting Hs, expressed in Degrees, Minutes and tenths, I added the minutes and tenths, and divided by 5. Next I added the degrees, and divided by 5.
Having obtained averages for both time and Hs, these numbers were used to reduce the sights. Turns out that the intercept, difference between Hc and Ho were quite large, much larger than when individual shots were reduced.
Assuming that I haven't blown the "math", I haven't noticed any glaring computational errors, where might the problem lie? Anyone have any ideas?
Thanks for attention, response, and any suggestions orcorrections.
Alan
----------------------------------------------------------------
NavList message boards and member settings: www.fer3.com/NavList
Members may optionally receive posts by email.
To cancel email delivery, send a message to NoMail[at]fer3.com
----------------------------------------------------------------