Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: Accuracy of position
    From: Dan Allen
    Date: 1999 Oct 19, 11:29 AM

    As I mentioned once several months ago, I have been able to determine my 
    position on land to a few hundred yards using metal sextants such as a Tamaya 
    Jupiter or C. Plath Navistar Professional.
    
    My procedure for these measurements was:
    
    1. Use my Garmin GPS III in averaging mode for 20 minutes to determine my 
    location to within 20 feet.  This was my assumed position.
    
    2. Measured the altitude of the sun using a Davis Artificial Horizon, so the 
    angles measured were double the actual values.
    
    3. I then input the date and time and measurements into a command line tool 
    I've written in the programming language C, with the following invocations of 
    the tool (which contains a nautical almanac accurate to 1" of arc and all of 
    the nav triangle computations as well):
    
    sun "7/18/1999" "2:41:19 p" -a 47~28.9 -b 121~47.9 -y 116~12.4 # Plath
    sun "7/18/1999" "2:42:45 p" -a 47~28.9 -b 121~47.9 -y 115~52.0 # Plath
    sun "7/18/1999" "2:44:55 p" -a 47~28.9 -b 121~47.9 -y 115~33.8 # Jupiter
    sun "7/18/1999" "2:47:42 p" -a 47~28.9 -b 121~47.9 -y 114~43.8 # Plath
    sun "7/18/1999" "2:49:08 p" -a 47~28.9 -b 121~47.9 -y 114~26.4 # Plath
    
    The -a and -b options for my tool input the assumed position (as measured by 
    my GPS in step #1), and the -y option inputs the altitude that I measured in 
    step #2 via the artificial horizon, which is then halved by the program.
    
    The output of these calculations are distances to the assumed position:
    
    Results with default refraction:
    -0.95 nmi
    -1.49 nmi
     4.23 nmi
    -1.41 nmi
     0.01 nmi
    
    Results at 70�F with 29.45 inHg: (the measured conditions at my house)
    -0.92 nmi
    -1.46 nmi
     4.26 nmi
    -1.38 nmi
     0.04 nmi
    
    Mean error = 0.108 nmi ~ 656 feet ~ 219 yards
    
    Not bad!  Note that individual sights varied more.  I want to repeat the 
    experiment but on the waves of the tossing sea.
    
    Dan
    
    Daniel K. Allen --> danallen{at}nwlink.com
    Navigate | Calculate | Set Sail!
    
    
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From  Navigation Mailing List [mailto:NAVIGATION-L{at}LISTSERV.WEBKAHUNA.COM]On Behalf Of Dr. Geoffrey
    Kolbe
    Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 1999 12:10 AM
    To: NAVIGATION-L{at}LISTSERV.WEBKAHUNA.COM
    Subject: Accuracy of position
    
    
    I would welcome some input on the accuracy of various aspects of celestial
    navigation using a sextant. I apologise if this has all been discussed
    before, (it almost certainly will have been).
    
    The first question concerns the absolute accuracy obtainable using a
    sextant to determine an altitude. I have briefly done some experiments (on
    dry land) where I used an artificial horizon (Freiberg) carefully levelled
    to better than 0.1'. The purpose of using an artificial horizon was to use
    the doubled altitude angle to effectively halve the errors in the arc and
    in reading the angle. I was able to obtain readings that were consistently
    within 0.2' of what they should have been. Has anyone else any experience
    of what kind of accuracy in the altitude is practically obtainable using a
    sextant?
    
    The next question is, what sort of practical working accuracy would you
    expect using a marine sextant at sea? Would 1.0' be a fair estimate or
    would you reasonably expect better (or worse) than this?
    
    The final question is, in your experience, what sort of accuracy in the
    computed position have you come to expect from the observation of two or
    more celestial bodies? In other words, having computed your position, what
    is the radius of the "comfort zone" circle that you would draw around that
    position, such that you would want known dangers to be outside this circle?
    (Note that this is a different question to what sort of theoretical
    accuracy should you expect.)
    
    Thankyou.
    
    Geoffrey.
    
    
    
    
    Dr Geoffrey Kolbe, Border Barrels Ltd., Newcastleton, TD9 0SN, Scotland
    Tel: +44 (0)13873 76253  Fax: +44 (0)13873 76214
    
                              www.border-barrels.com
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site