NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Accuracy of Lewis and Clark Observations
From: Bruce Stark
Date: 2002 Aug 9, 00:40 EDT
From: Bruce Stark
Date: 2002 Aug 9, 00:40 EDT
More on George's August 2 posting, starting with the second in the series of questions and remarks: George: >2. Page 177. Preston refers to Maskelyne's Tables Requisite, which "describes the calculation of Moon altitudes without explicitly recommending the use of calculated lunar altitudes for correcting lunar distances." But one wonders what else, in those days before intercepts and position lines, a calculated Moon altitude would have been useful for.< Me: Good point. For my part, I can think of no other use that would have justified giving them space in a manual of practical navigation. As for Maskelyne being "on the ball," ABSOLUTELY. He wasn't just a brilliant astronomer. He also had an extraordinary amount of common sense. The more I know about the navigation methods and needs of the time, the more I respect him. George: >3. Page 178. Preston states, about Lewis- "As he did not have the three sextants or octants required for three simultaneous measurements, it is likely that he used the Problem 4th method ..." [The "Problem 4th method" is a way of calculating the altitudes rather than measuring them]. I do not accept this as a valid argument, though the conclusion may be correct. Although the Navy, overstaffed with officers, might have established a ritual with three observers and three instruments, it is quite feasible for the job to be done by one man, with one sextant, measuring in a defined sequence. That is what Joshua Slocum had to do, single-handed, and so did countless merchant vessel navigators.< Me: At sea it's quite easy for one person to take the altitudes before and after the series of distances. But doing the same thing on land with a reflecting pool horizon can be a frustrating, blunder-inducing drill. And there's no need of it. Since the safety of a ship is not at stake, the extra time it takes to calculate the altitudes is not a problem. The calculation doesn't have to be done until sometime before the final map is drawn up, and can be done at leisure. I expect Lewis was instructed not to bother with the altitudes. In any event, he followed the standard, cut-and-dried procedure of surveyors and explorers by not taking them. Enough for now. I'm off to bed. Bruce