Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Re: A-10 Sextant Manual
    From: Gary LaPook
    Date: 2009 Jun 12, 01:14 -0700

    The bigger problem is that the azimuth of the sun changes as it moves
    across the sky, not that the LOP is slightly curved. Look at Weems
    writings on this at
    
    http://www.geocities.com/fredienoonan/landfall.html
    
    Chichester describes the same procedure in the Observers' Book.
    
    The problem of shifting LOPs and curved LOPs is handled by using the
    destination as the AP and this was the method being used by Chichester.
    Done this way, as long he manovered the plane to keep reading the same
    altitude from his sextant as that which would be measured at the same
    instant of time at the destination, then he can be sure he is staying on
    the LOP through destination, whatever the azimuth happens to be.
    Chichester did this and took an additional sight to confirm that he was
    staying on the LOP to Lord Howe.
    
    gl
    
    
    
    Christian Scheele wrote:
    > I didn't misunderstand you.
    >
    > "Pointing out his
    > plane's engine problems you say he was reckless."
    >
    > I then went on to discuss Chichester's navigation method on my own account:
    >
    > "I don't really think I'm
    > qualified enough to judge his decision to navigate using a (his?) method iof
    > ....precomputed D.R. ...I mean, his sun shot of course gave him only a
    > position line, or rather, an assumed position line"
    >
    > I was, however, really unclear. Gary's response alerted me to this. I did
    > not intend to argue against the concept of using LOPs, but it sure looks
    > like it, so my apologies. In my next email, therefore, I rephrased my
    > comment, which, in fact, concerned LOPs which are so long that they are
    > really lines with changing gradients for plotting purposes. (Assuming nobody
    > would bother to plot curves themselves on a Mercator chart.) If you then fly
    > along one course because you assume from D.R. that you know which gradient
    > or bearing applies to the part of the LOP you are on, when in fact you are
    > on a part of  the LOP that has another bearing, then would you not fly off
    > the LOP? If so, the real question becomes: Would you be able to use a sort
    > of running fix to work out your position and thus rectify the problem of
    > determining which part of the LOP you are on? I think so, what do you think?
    > That must be quite a manoeuvre for one flying single-handed. It demonstrates
    > how important good D.R. is.
    >
    > Perusing "The Lonely Sea and the Sky", I confirmed that Chichester estimated
    > his wind speed on his flight, rather than use on a device. He also didn't
    > want to check his compass before the flight "except against Norfolk Island".
    > Ignoring the problem concerning long LOPs for a moment, it would seem that
    > these navigational decisions of Chichester compounded the risk already posed
    > by the questionable state of his plane.
    >
    > Christian Scheele
    >
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: 
    > To: 
    > Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 12:17 PM
    > Subject: [NavList 8615] Re: A-10 Sextant Manual
    >
    >
    >
    > Regarding  Sir Francis Chichester:
    >
    > Dr. Kolbe has it right.
    >
    > I was referring not his astonishing navigation for which I have the very
    > highest regard indeed, but to the fact he was willing to put his life on the
    > line with an aeroplane that he describes in his book already had various
    > problems such as having fitting floats without checking if they leaked or
    > not, and an engine that had already given him problems, and in the run-up
    > check before leaving for Norfolk Island he says:-
    >
    > "I could only get 1780 revs, forty less than I expected, and my spirits
    > sank. I should never get off with a full load with a motor like that, but
    > said nothing to the CO about it.  The seaplane was launched. I faced her
    > into the wind, and opened the throttle; to my surprise she left the water as
    > easily as a sea bird..... ".
    >
    > The man must have been mad or very determined, or both.
    >
    > To cross the Tasman Sea - a nasty stretch of water notorious for bad
    > weather, two thirds the width of the Atlantic, in a single engined float
    > plane with engine in dubious condition is more than reckless.   But got away
    > with it.
    >
    > My impression from reading his books is he was what we would call a "loose
    > cannon" and contemptuous of any advice or authority.  From reading about him
    > it seems he must have been a truly remarkable person but not very
    > 'likeable'.
    >
    > Douglas Denny.
    >
    > Chichester. England.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > >
    >
    >
    
    
    --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
    Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc
    To post, email NavList@fer3.com
    To , email NavList-@fer3.com
    -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site