Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Re: 2011 Nautical Almanac
    From: Antoine Couëtte
    Date: 2011 Feb 7, 23:52 -0800

    RE :
    http://www.fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx?i=115594
    [NavList] Re: 2011 Nautical Almanac
    From: pmh099---com
    Date: 7 Feb 2011 19:58

    Hello Andres,

    That's a difference of less than one second from 67.2s, which is hardly detectable for our purposes, so either value will work OK.


    Peter Hakel

    *****************************************************************

    From: Andres Ruiz <navigationalalgorithms---com>
    To: NavList@fer3.com
    Sent: Mon, February 7, 2011 5:05:06 AM
    Subject: [NavList] Re: 2011 Nautical Almanac


    Hello Kermit and PH!


    If no approximation for Delta T is used:

    Delta T = 32.184 s + (TAI - UTC) - (UT1 - UTC)
    Bulletin C: from 2009 January 1, 0h UTC, until further notice : UTC-TAI = -34 s
    Bulletin D: 6 January 2011, 0h UTC DUT1 = (UT1-UTC) = -0.2 s

    So Delta T = 66.384 s

    Is OK?

    http://maia.usno.navy.mil/

    Regards,

    --
    Andr�s Ruiz
    Navigational Algorithms
    http://sites.google.com/site/navigationalalgorithms/

    ****************************************************************

    Dear Peter and Andr�s,


    Yes, I agree with everything both of you indicated.

    We can have a "super accurate" DeltaT value through proceeding as you have shown Andr�s. It would also imply computing the Moon Coordinates in the TT/TDT time scale with an accuracy better than 0.5" . It can be done, and in the case you want to "choose" just one Celestial Body, the ELP 2000xx Theory(ies) truncated to reach 0.5" overall accuracy take(s) up MUCH more space than a truncation to 6".

    For my own use - and as ealier mentioned on this Forum - I am using a "canned version" of DeltaT which can be found here : http://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/SEcat5/deltatpoly.html . Peter, don't you use the same TT-UT source ?

    Such version is expected/believed to be accurate to +/- 1 second of Time from the/some remote past until nowadays. But, both for the past and for the future I always prompt for a TT-UT value in my programs to cover cases when the User needs to use his "own" value, including TT-UT = 0 if he wants to compute in the TT/TDT/ET Time scale for comparison whith more accurate sources.


    Best Regards from Kermit


    Antoine M. "Kermit" Cou�tte


    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    NavList message boards and member settings: www.fer3.com/NavList
    Members may optionally receive posts by email.
    To cancel email delivery, send a message to NoMail[at]fer3.com
    ----------------------------------------------------------------

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site