Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: "100 Problems in Celestial Navigation"
    From: Joel Jacobs
    Date: 2004 Apr 2, 18:10 -0500

    Herbert,
    
    I knew I would get a scholarly answer from you.
    
    I remember using the least squares method in statistical analysis to
    establish a line of central tendency, used it to separate the fixed and
    variable elements of costs in financial analysis, and in a nautical sense,
    to determine fuel burn at various RPM and speeds. I discovered the bother
    was NOT worth the effort, and did it visually using a see through or plastic
    rule which seemed to work equally well.  You visually average the dispersion
    of the observations around a line, that on the average, would split them
    equally above and below what be came the line of best fit.
    
    As far as the cocked hat, did you mention that bisecting the apex of all
    angles would produce a point that has some mathematical, though not
    necessarily accurate, MPP? I think that it would work for more than three
    angles.
    
    One of the Tamaya navigation calculators had an algorithm that produced a
    MPP, but I forget which of the later series it was, and certainly don't
    recall the modeling used.
    
    Thanks Herbert,
    
    Joel Jacobs
    
    
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Herbert Prinz" 
    To: 
    Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 2:55 PM
    Subject: Re: "100 Problems in Celestial Navigation"
    
    
    > Joel Jacobs wrote:
    >
    > > Since you indicate an error may be the result of estimating the MPP
    within a
    > > cocked hat, I am interested in what method you recommend to determine
    the
    > > MPP?
    >
    > Joel,
    >
    > Assuming random observation error, the MPP is that point for which the sum
    of
    > the squares of the distances from the individual LOPs is a minimum.
    >
    > 1) For two LOPs, this is the point of their intersection.
    >
    > 2) For three LOPs, there is a way to find this point geometrically. The
    > construction is based on the fact that if a,b,c are the sides of the
    cocked hat
    > triangle and Da, Db, Dc the distances from the MPP to the respective
    sides, then
    > a is to Da as b is to Db and c is to Dc.
    >
    > Therefore, to construct the MPP, pick two arbitrary distances Da' and Db'
    that
    > are in the ratio of a : b, draw parallels at these distances to a and b
    > respectively (either both inside or both outside the triangle), connect
    their
    > intersection point with C and name this line sC. Repeat the same procedure
    for
    > b,c and A, obtaining sA. The intersecton of sC and sA is the MPP.
    >
    > 3) For more than 3 LOPs, there is no geometrical way. The numeric solution
    is
    > the one that is obtained with the algorithm published in the Nautical
    Almanac,
    > pp. 277-283.
    >
    > Herbert Prinz
    
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site